Editorial Standards

These standards govern every piece Pulso publishes. They are the reason a clinician can trust what appears here, and they are not negotiable at the level of an individual article.

The improvement test

A piece runs if it leaves the reader measurably better: a protocol, a number, a decision. News that changes nothing for the reader is not Pulso content, however newsworthy it is.

Who writes

Contributors are licensed doctoral clinicians, writing under their own names and credentials. No anonymous content. No ghost-written product content. A contributor writes as a professional only; no article or profile references any advisory or client relationship.

Evidence and endorsements

Claims carry their evidence with them: a study, a dose, a figure, a source a reader can check. Pulso does not endorse any product, supplement, device, or service. Education explains evidence, dosing, and risk. It never sells.

Patient information

No patient information, ever. No case detail that could identify a person, however well disguised the author believes it to be.

The Capital pillar

Finance content is general education only. No individualized advice, no testimonials, no performance figures. Capital pieces carry a stricter disclosure and are reviewed by a board member other than the author.

Review and corrections

Every piece passes the editorial board for accuracy, originality, and fit before publication. Errors are corrected visibly, in the open, under the corrections policy.